Who IS "The Crown" Anyway ?? How We Got Conned !!

The Crown is owned and operated by the Roman Cult, and has been since 1213. Note: The papal crown has not been worn since 1962. The papal crown worn by pedophile Joseph Ratzinger in this image has been photoshopped in. The message is the same...  "The Crown" IS the rule of Rome. We are still living under the trick of these Babylonian magicians. The magic trick has been revealed.

The Crown is owned and operated by the Roman Cult, and has been since 1213

Published on Mar 9, 2016

The Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783 says that King George III was the Arch Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and the United States of America. This video goes through how the Roman Cult orchestrated the slave trade, then the War of Independence, then the War of 1812, then the Civil War, then WW1, WW2, and now they are building up to WW3.

All warfare is commerce, and all commerce is warfare.
All fictitious entities operate under Roman Law.

London c.1650 AD, prior to the Great Fire of London 1666

Image

A Conventional History of London

The "modern" world of so-called Western Civilization began at the end of the 17th century with the blossoming of the British Empire. The underpinnings of that Empire actually began several hundred years earlier with the establishment of the City of London, which is now an 800-year old corporation that controls finance and philosophy for an entity called "The Crown".


Who or What Constitutes "The Crown"

This article was originally posted on the following website. It has now been removed: http://openeye.99k.org/The%20Crown.html  Published on June 24, 2012

WHO IS THE "CROWN"

This entity is the creator and controller of the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve. They also control the World Bank, the IMF and associated cartels. "The Crown" identity is kept most secret. The Crown's agent, The Bank of England assumed control of the United States during the Roosevelt administration (1901-1909) when its agent J.P. Morgan took over 25% of American business. Read Here

The area marked in red is the City of London within greater Metropolitan London.

The Crown has never been the King or Queen of England since the establishment of this corporate body. The Crown is the directorate of the Corporation. The island of Britain is a financial oligarchy run by "The Crown" which refers to the "City of London" not the Queen. The City is run by the Bank of England, a "private" corporation. The City is a sovereign state located in the heart of greater London. It became a Sovereign State in 1694 when king William the third of Orange privatised and turned the Bank of England over to the banksters. Considered the "Vatican of the financial world," the City is not subject to British law.

It has its own courts, its own laws, its own flag and its own police force, separate from metropolitan London. City (Crown/Corporation) police drive red patrol cars and their uniforms are slightly different from the Metropolitan Police. Read Here

It houses the privatised* Bank of England, Lloyds of London, the London stock exchange, all British banks, the branch offices of 385 foreign banks and 70 US banks as well as Fleet Street's newspaper and publishing monopolies. It is also the headquarters for British Freemasonry.

* In 1945, The Bank of England was nationalized by the Labour government. It is allegedly no longer private. The bank is suposedly publically owned through the Secretary to the Treasury. Who or what pulls the strings behind the scenes is anyone's guess.

Source

The City of London has its own Lord Mayor who represents The Crown - his name is Roger Gifford - the head of the Corporation of London. Read Here It has a council of 12 members who rule the Corporation under the Lord Mayor. The Lord Mayor and his 12 member council serves as proxies or representatives who sit-in for some of the worlds wealthiest, most powerful banking families. 

When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms. The Queen bows to the Mayor only in the city. Outside of the city of London he bows to her. 

Source   Note the golden coach.

The City of London is the only part of Britain over which parliament has no authority. In one respect at least the Corporation acts as the superior body: it imposes on the House of Commons a figure called the remembrancer: an official lobbyist who sits behind the Speaker's chair and ensures that, whatever our elected representatives might think, the City's rights and privileges are protected.

In 1886, Andrew Carnegie wrote that, "six or seven men can plunge the nation into war without consulting Parliament at all." Vincent Vickers, a director of the Bank of England from 1910-1919 blamed the Corporation/ City for the wars of the world.

The British Empire was an extension of bankers' financial interests. Indeed, all the colonies were "Crown Colonies". They belonged to The City and were not subject to British law although Englishmen were expected to conquer and pay for them.

Western colonization is widely taught in school history courses, so it need not be repeated here. One key aspect of the colonial period is generally omitted or skimmed over from the more basic history courses. This is the fact that all the "Crown colonies" were established on a corporate model with financial ties to the City of London - not the nation of England or Britain.

Source

The island of Britain is a Crown Colony.
The City of London is not. 

The directorate of The Crown, whoever they were, had NO loyalty to any nation - They were and are, devoted entirely to their philosophy which seeks absolute power over an earthly realm. For more than 250 years, the servants of The Crown brought untold wealth back from the colonies to the British Isles - for themselves: the population of the United Kingdom (English, Scottish, Irish, Welsh peoples) received very little wealth even though they provided the tax base and cannon fodder.

Source

The people were invaluable assets of the Crown, but they knew not what they served - and still don't. "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who believe they are free". Historian Jeffrey Steinberg could be referring to the US, Canada and Australia when he writes, "England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, are today little more than slave plantations and social engineering laboratories, serving the needs of the Crown/City of London.

According to the "American Almanac," the crown bankers are part of a network with an estimated $10 trillion in assets. It lords over such corporate giants as Royal Dutch Shell, Imperial Chemical Industries, Lloyds of London, Unilever, Lonrho, Rio Tinto Zinc, and Anglo American DeBeers. It dominates the world supply of petroleum, gold, diamonds, and many other vital raw materials.

The Crown/ City of London dominates the world's speculative markets. A tightly interlocking group of corporations, involved in raw materials extraction, finance, insurance, transportation, and food production, controls the lion's share of the world market, and exerts virtual "choke point'' control over world industry. Read Here

Source

If one wants to know the genuine motives for particular actions in history they are told to "follow the money." But that is only half of it - one must also follow the philosophy - the religious beliefs of those in control.

For purposes of clarity, let The Crown always refer to a stealthy circle of power brokers who all believe in the Masonic philosophy - the brotherhood of man ruled by philosopher kings (or adepts) in league with the God of Masonry. One need only wade through the cumbersome histories of Masonry and also read Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma to see precisely that this power-philosophy encompasses virtually all the religious notions ever conjured up by man.

Ordinary members of Masonic lodges, are to these adepts and their goals what the people of the Western civilizations are to the directors of the Crown - useful fools. This secretive cabal is represented by the dominant political, economic and cultural institutions across the world. Western society has been subverted and western culture is bankrupt. Democracy is a form of social control and the mass media and education are forms of indoctrination.

Source

Up until 1946 when it was nationalised the Bank of England was a private run bank that lent money it created out of nothing to the English government and was paid back with interest. A famous story related to the bank and the Rothschilds is the Battle of Waterloo in which Nathan Rothschild used his inside knowledge of the outcome to play the market by selling his English bonds and giving the impression that the French had won therefore causing a rush by other brokers to sell quickly which drove the price down to 5% of their original worth. Once the bottom had dropped out the market he then re-bought as much as he could and in doing so he multiplied his wealth twenty times in 3 days of trading.

At the same time of being immensely wealthy he also became the single largest debtor to the English government which ultimately gave him control over the bank of England. English bonds were a debt guaranteed by future tax revenue of the English government, therefore the taxes the citizens paid were going to pay the 8% interest that the English government had to pay to borrow the money. As Nathan now controlled the majority of the English bonds he could determine the price and therefore the supply of the English currency which gave him great power over the countries finances.
"I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply." – Nathan Rothschild

The bank of England was nationalised in 1946 but because the government was broke after the second world war they had no money to buy out the shareholders so instead they were issued with government stocks and although the government now earned money from the profits they had to pay interest on any new stock they issued to pay for the shares. In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank Of England Nominees Limited, a private limited company with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. The objectives of the company are:

"To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them…."

Source

This company is very special as its protected by the official secrets act, its Royal Charter status and is exempt from the normal disclosure requirements that other companies have to comply with to meet section 27 of the Companies Act 1976. The reason being is that the major players in the world of finance including the Queen of England and other Royal families use this company to purchase shares and remain anonymous.

However even though (on the surface at least) the Bank of England is now state owned its important to note that up to 97% of the UK's money supply is privately controlled being in the form of interest bearing loans created by the big commercial banks. The bank holds very little government stock and the Bank's profits primarily come from the issuing of coins and notes for use by high street banks.

Therefore it seems the Bank Of England has reduced in size and importance over the years and is now mainly a regulatory body that oversees the existing banking system. Referred to as "the lender of last resort" one of its main functions as the bankers bank is to support banks that get into difficulty such as during the recent financial melt down.

Further interest on this subject can be found in the book The Empire Of The City and in the documentaries The Ring Of Power and The Corporation

Introduction to "The Crown Corporation" by "I am sovereign" on fb

Image by "I am Sovereign" on Facebook

This entire article was published on Facebook May 9, 2013 by "I am Sovereign".
This is not my own work - BronnyNZ

NOW HOLD ON A SECOND I am not really saying kill them dead... What I am saying is if we are going to kill anyone lets get it right. Every day when you buy something everyday when you pay tax and vote you support the murders globally to protect these three city states - the Vatican, the 1 square mile City of London and Washington DC. The statement is more to shock you into reading but in reality if some one has to die lets not make it innocent people residing in and around oil or opium producing countries, that are under occupation just to maintain the ruling elites' power structure. We really need to take some responsibility as we are allowing these corrupt murderers to rule over us.

PLEASE READ AND WATCH THE VIDEOS BEFORE YOU COMMENT IT WILL BE OBVIOUS IF YOU HAVE OR HAVE NOT AND IF YOU HAVE NOT DO NOT POST PLEASE [on Facebook comments]

I ["I am Sovereign"] have updated this and made changes I will keep updating this article and add more great videos and articles... 

NOW YOU HAVE NO EXCUSES TO GIVE TO YOUR CHILDREN. YOU WERE TOLD AND YOU WERE WARNED...

The Crown, the City of London is not subject to British law just like District of Columbia (Washington DC) is not subject to United States Law. Crown land, Crown Treaties, Crown Corporations and Crown Prosecutors are not owned by their host countries - they are only managed.

WHO OR WHAT CONSTITUTES THE "CROWN"

The "modern" world of so-called Western Civilization began at the end of the 17th century with the blossoming of the British Empire. The underpinnings of that empire actually began several hundred years earlier with the establishment of the City of London, which is now an 800-year old corporation that controls finance and philosophy for an entity called the Crown. This entity is the creator and controller of the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve. They also control the World Bank, the IMF and associated cartels. [See: "Bretton Woods"]. The Crown identity is kept most secret [My personal opinion is that it's a seat held by the figurehead of The Pope for all the elite families of Europe... which includes all the Lords of the House of Rothschild banking cabal as well - BronnyNZ]. The Crown/Bank of England assumed control of the United States during the Roosevelt administration (1901-1909) when its agent J.P. Morgan took over 25% of American business. 

"The Crown" has never been the King or Queen of England since the establishment of this corporate body. The Crown is the directorate of the corporation. The island of Britain is a financial oligarchy run by the "Crown" which refers to the "City of London" [one square mile in the middle of old Roman Londinium - Latin language hint right there! Roman, Rome, Vatican], not the Queen. The City is run by the Bank of England, a "private" corporation. The City is a sovereign state located in the heart of greater London. It became a sovereign state in 1694 when king William the third of Orange privatized and turned the Bank of England over to the banksters. Considered the "Vatican of the financial world", the City is not subject to British law [in the same way that the actual Vatican is not subject to Italian law. For example, the "age of consent" for sex was raised around two years ago to age 12. Yes... in the mainly male-dominated world of the Vatican City. You've got to wonder what all this is about!]

The City of London has its own courts, its own laws, its own flag and its own police force, separate from the metropolitan. City (crown/corporation) police drive red police cars and their uniforms are slightly different from the Metropolitan Police. 

It houses the privatised* Bank of England, Lloyds of London, the London Stock Exchange, all British banks, the branch offices of 385 foreign banks and 70 US banks, as well as Fleet Street's newspaper and publishing monopolies. It is also the headquarters for British Freemasonry.

*(In 1945, The Bank of England was nationalized by the Labour government. It is allegedly no longer private. The bank is suposedly publically owned through the Secretary to the Treasury. Who or what pulls the strings behind the scenes is anyone's guess)

[In answer to "I am Sovereign", all commercial trading banks are tied to the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) situated in Basel, Switzerland.]

The City of London has its own lord mayor who represents the Crown. His name is Roger Gifford (2013). The lord mayor is the head of the Corporation of London. 

The City has a council of 12 members who rule the corporation under the lord mayor. The lord mayor and his 12 member council serves as proxies or representatives who sit-in for some of the worlds wealthiest, most powerful banking families. [I would allege: Simply for the most powerful families in Europe - Old elite families.]

When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms. The Queen bows to the Mayor only in The City. Outside of the City of London he bows to her.

The City of London is the only part of Britain over which parliament has no authority. In one respect at least, the Corporation acts as the superior body: It imposes on the House of Commons a figure called the remembrancer. This is an official lobbyist for The City of London who sits behind the Speaker's chair and ensures that whatever our elected representatives might think, The City's rights and privileges are protected.

In 1886, Andrew Carnegie wrote, "Six or seven men can plunge the nation into war without consulting Parliament at all." Vincent Vickers, a director of the Bank of England from 1910-1919, blamed the Corporation/the City for the wars of the world.

The British Empire was an extension of bankers' financial interests. Indeed, all the colonies were "Crown Colonies." They belonged to the City and were not subject to British law although Englishmen were expected to conquer and pay for them.

Western colonization is widely taught in school history courses, so it need not be repeated here. One key aspect of the colonial period is generally omitted or skimmed over from the more basic history courses. This is the fact that all the Crown colonies were established on a corporate model with financial ties to the City of London - not the nation of England or Britain. The island of Britain is a crown colony - The City of London is not.

The directorate of the Crown, whoever they are, has no loyalty to any nation. They were and are, devoted entirely to their philosophy which seeks absolute power over an earthly realm. For more than 250 years, the servants of the Crown brought untold wealth back from the colonies to the British Isles - for themselves. The population of the United Kingdom (English, Scottish, Irish, Welsh peoples) received very little wealth even though they provided the tax base and cannon fodder.

The people were invaluable assets of the Crown, but they knew not what they served - and still don't. (None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who believe they are free). Historian Jeffrey Steinberg could be referring to the US, Canada and Australia when he writes, "England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, are today little more than slave plantations and social engineering laboratories", serving the needs of the Crown/the City of London.

According to the "American Almanac," the Crown bankers are part of a network with an estimated $10 trillion in assets. It lords over such corporate giants as Royal Dutch Shell, Imperial Chemical Industries, Lloyds of London, Unilever, Lonrho, Rio Tinto Zinc, and Anglo American DeBeers. It dominates the world supply of petroleum, gold, diamonds, and many other vital raw materials.

The Crown/City of London dominates the world's speculative markets. It is a tightly interlocking group of corporations, involved in raw materials extraction, finance, insurance, transportation, and food production. It controls the lion's share of the world market and exerts virtual "choke point'' control over world industry. 

If one wants to know the genuine motives for particular actions in history they are told to "follow the money." But that is only half of it - one must also follow the philosophy - the religious beliefs of those in control.

For purposes of clarity, let the Crown always refer to a stealthy circle of power brokers who all believe in the Masonic philosophy - the brotherhood of man ruled by philosopher kings (or adepts) in league with the God of Masonry. One need only wade through the cumbersome histories of Masonry and also read Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma to see precisely that this power-philosophy encompasses virtually all the religious notions ever conjured up by man.

Ordinary members of Masonic lodges are to these adepts and their goals, what the people of the Western civilizations are to the directors of the Crown - useful fools.

This secretive cabal is represented by the dominant political, economic and cultural institutions across the world. Western society has been subverted and western culture is bankrupt. Democracy is a form of social control and the mass media and education are forms of indoctrination.

THE BANK OF ENGLAND

The Bank of England was created in 1694 by a Scotsman William Paterson who famously said:

The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing. – William Paterson

Up until 1946 when it was nationalised the Bank of England was a privately run bank that lent money it created out of nothing to the English government and was paid back with interest. A famous story related to the bank and the Rothschilds is the Battle of Waterloo in which Nathan Rothschild used his inside knowledge of the outcome to play the market by selling his English bonds and giving the impression that the French had won therefore causing a rush by other brokers to sell quickly which drove the price down to 5% of their original worth. Once the bottom had dropped out the market he then re-bought as much as he could and in doing so he multiplied his wealth twenty times in 3 days of trading.

At the same time of being immensely wealthy, he also became the single largest creditor to the English government, which ultimately gave him control over the Bank of England. English bonds were a debt guaranteed by future tax revenue of the English government, therefore the taxes the citizens paid were going to pay the 8% interest that the English government had to pay to borrow the money. As Nathan now controlled the majority of the English bonds he could determine the price and therefore the supply of the English currency which gave him great power over the countries finances.

"I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply." – Nathan Rothschild

The Bank of England was nationalised in 1946 but because the government was broke after the Second World War they had no money to buy out the shareholders, so instead they were issued with government stocks. Although the government now earned money from the profits, they had to pay interest on any new stock they issued to pay for the shares.

In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank Of England Nominees Limited, a private limited company with two of its 100 £1 shares issued [sic]. The objectives of the company are:

"To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them…."

This company is very special as it's protected by the Official Secrets Act, its Royal Charter status and is exempt from the normal disclosure requirements that other companies have to comply with to meet section 27 of the Companies Act 1976. The reason being is that the major players in the world of finance including the Queen of England and other Royal families use this company to purchase shares and remain anonymous.

However even though (on the surface at least) the Bank of England is now state owned, it's important to note that up to 97% of the UK's money supply is privately controlled being in the form of interest bearing loans created by the big commercial banks. The bank holds very little government stock and the Bank's profits primarily come from the issuing of coins and notes for use by high street banks.

Therefore it seems the Bank Of England has reduced in size and importance over the years and is now mainly a regulatory body that oversees the existing banking system. Referred to as "the lender of last resort" one of its main functions as the bankers bank is to support banks that get into difficulty such as during the recent financial melt down.

VIDEOS:
The Crown Corporation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Kn5DMRd7Qjs

The Holy Roman Empire Rules Today

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq38Qggtipk
District of Columbia Act of 1871 Defacto formed 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPkauG6qE8k

I also thought this video worth adding here... 

Reflections And Warnings - An Interview With Aaron Russo {Full Film}

Uploaded on Jun 1, 2009

In an historic final interview, filmmaker and music promoter Aaron Russo goes in depth on the insider-knowledge given to him by a member of the Rockefeller family. Russo was told-- prior to 9/11-- of plans to stage terror attacks, invade foreign nations, and kickstart a high-tech police state control grid that would track the populations' every move with implantable RFID microchips.

This information-packed presentation is filled with never-before seen footage. Throughout the film, Alex Jones breaks down the latest activities of the New World Order and how it ties into what Russo predicted.

Aaron explains how the elite created the women's liberation movement to break up the family and tax working women. Russo breaks down the deception of democracy-- which is nothing more than mob rule guaranteed to produce tyranny.

Russo also exposes the IRS & Federal Reserve. He blasts the unconstitutional and predatory institutions that have crippled the American Republic and crushed the people with bogus taxes, inflation and loss of privacy. Russo explains that he himself was persecuted in the late 80s by a criminal 'retroactive' tax scheme that attempted to levy new taxes on years already passed.

As night falls on the Republic, Aaron Russo delivers a powerful call for the forces of liberty to rise and crush tyranny. Only then can the Republic be restored.

THIS DVD INCLUDES:

- Never-before seen behind the scenes footage

- An exclusive interview with Aaron about his life

- Aaron Russo radio interviews from the Alex Jones Show

Admiralty Law and Temple Bar Symbolism in the Modern Court Room

Here is some interesting Maritime and other symbolism that still exists in the 21st century court room.... I thought many people might be interested in 'the spirit' of the court room:

(1) "The Dock" in the courtroom is where you tie your "ship" (your person, your body), ie: where you are required to give account of what's on your 'Manifest' or 'Berth Certificate' which is the fictitious representation of yourself, ie: where you give account for offences allegedly committed 

(2) "The Bar" to which your lawyer has sworn his/ her service is Temple Bar in the City of London. It's the delineating line that separates Westminster and the City of London. People were taken into "The City" (the Templar/ Masonic citadel - fortress, protectorate), to be tried, tortured, and hung but often not to the point of death, and often, were cut into four pieces as a part of the execution... "Hung, drawn and quartered." This sentence was handed down to prisoners right up until 1870 in London... as written about by Charles Dickens, as seen with his own eyes (Victorian writer).

http://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org/hdq.html

(3) "The Bench" where the judge now sits was the bench where men (generally) would be stripped to the waist, be laid out face down over the bench, and whipped to the point of death. Other tortures were also meted out at 'the bench'. It's the place of punishment. The tortures included flaying of a man's chest with a sharp scalpel-like knife while the man was living. These tortures/ punishments/ sentences were a public spectacle. People gathered to watch these events in the large open forum or 'gallery' - the place where the 'pictures' or 'snapshots' of torture could be openly viewed by the public... and by the approving clergy. All of these things took place in front of the Templar church, where all manner of blood-letting and atrocities were authorised 'in law'. This is That to which your lawyer has sworn, when he/ she swore to "The Bar" 

(4) "The Well" is the space between where the defendant sits with his/ her lawyer, and 'the bench'. No one is to approach the judge across The Well, unless they request to 'approach the bench'. Why is this ?? This place in 1666 was 'The Wiel', ie: the place where the whips were wielded. Blood dripped from the ripped open bodies laying across 'the bench' being whipped, or blood gushed out in a flood as the innards of the living man was torn from his body and burned in a fire in front of his open eyes, as per his sentence, recorded by Dickens... "What the Dickens!" No body would want to cross the wiel... not in a million years. 

This and these other traditions are still observed by token, and kept in the modern court room to this day. It's freakin' horrific !! These are the traditions upon which our Judicial System sits. Please also note: a 'jury-mast' was a defacto temporary mast raised in a ship in the event that the original one was broken for any reason... It was known as 'the assistant' or 'helper'. 

The word 'jury' comes from the word "to swear", with an implied meaning that it is "to swear to something that is false". We have trials "by jury" or in the Latin literal translation, "per jury". Please also note that trials are to remedy "in-jury" or for our purposes, "IN-jury". Now there's a real brain-twister for the scholarly !!  It begs the question, "What REALLY is injury?" Is "injury" (in word, in intent, and in spirit) actually a HOAX that we all collectively decided to play ??  I prefer the word "harm" which has no convoluted meanings (from Germanic, Nordic, Frisian) to the word "injury" - derived from the corrupted, conniving words of the Romans.

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=harm&allowed_in_frame=0

http://www.flickr.com/photos/john_berghout/5680818143/

See the maps below:

This is where 'it all' went on... Please note the locations of 'Temple Bar' and 'The Temple', of the close proximity to 'Chancery Lane', to Fleet Prison, Newgate Prison and "Ludgate" where there was also a prison. Tyburn was the location of the 'Tyburn Tree'. This was a killing ground, where multiple hangings simultaneously could be carried out. In this 21st century, archaeologist have dug up mass graves, not only in the general vicinity of Tyburn, but also, all down Oxford Street. MASS GRAVES FULL OF BONES !!! The Killing Fields of London.This is a very sad legacy indeed for the City of London to leave populations of Earth - so many look to London for so much...

Please compare the 17th Century London Map below with the 400AD Map of Londinium, particularly the features in the western parts of the city...  the fort, the temple, the cemetery and the amphitheatre, as well as the general street layouts.  I think we can learn quite a lot about the 'spirit' that hovered around these places since Roman times, in a quiet reflective study of these two maps...  Enjoy.

by Bronny NZ

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/chancery
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludgate
http://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/aw_cuttings/ocr/p_134a.html
http://map.shakespeare.kcl.ac.uk/blogs/map-articles/tyburn-deadly-tree-to-tree-of-life/

London 1660 AD

                                Enlargement:

Londinium 400 AD

Source

The Treaty of Waitangi Office - Definitions And How To Claim Redress

A short introduction:  "The Treaty of Waitangi"

The following is an introduction as to how "The Treaty of Waitangi" applies in practice in the 21st Century. It is not a "dead document" that exists as a nice piece of history we can look at in a museum somewhere.  It is a "Living Document" that permeates ALL of New Zealand society, from Education to Health, from Public Policy-making to environmental conservation. The Treaty of Waitangi EXISTS (present tense) in every social sector in Aotearoa-New Zealand...

And so it should !!!

Aotearoa-New Zealand has ONLY had 'the Treaty' up to this point to blunten the edge of the global corporate sword.  There is no doubt in my mind that the 'global corporate coloniser' would have come in, raped and pillaged these lands long ago, as it has done in countries all over the world, were it not for Maori standing strong and holding up The Treaty of Waitangi at every turn, to thwart and curb the ambitions of the government of the day, who were allowing these corporates to enter.  

We have a lot to be Absolutely grateful for, that Hobson, Busby and the Northern Confederation of Chiefs ever signed such a document. More harms...  MANY MORE harms would have come to this country were it not for The Treaty of Waitangi, and for that, myself and so many other non-Maori now living in Aotearoa are eternally grateful.  Thank you. 

Treaty of Waitangi Settlement Claims

In the modern socio-political environment, claims to land title and other resource uses (such as fisheries) can be made by tangata whenua  (pr. fenua) through the "Office of Treaty Settlements", as linked on this article. 

tangata whenua = "the people of the land", ie: the occupants on this land prior to the 19th century Europeans arrived here in Aotearoa-New Zealand, being the divided tribes of Maoridom. 

Please note: Chinese relics have been found in this last decade along the NZ West Coast dating from around 2000 years ago - so Maori were not the exclusive visitors and occupants of these lands... many others have come and gone before, and since the arrival of Maori. 

Maori descendants who have proven lineage to the original tribes, are able to make claims for ancestral land to be returned to them that had been taken through seizure and confiscation. A lot of land was confiscated via the British military (ie: the 19th century Maori Wars). Land was simply seized by force from the various tribes up and down Aotearoa.  It can not be forgotten that a lot of land was also sold.... undoubtedly at an unfair price.  There are certainly instances of lands being sold by tribal individuals or groups who had NO RIGHT to sell the lands on behalf of their group. So as you can imagine, what happened in the past makes it very 'messy' for the present time.


Treaty of Waitangi Settlement Pay-Outs

If the outright return of lands is not practical for some reason, there is an alternative being that a monetary reimbursement of these lands will be made, which gets paid by the NZ Government, out of the tax-payer dollar. These 'reimbursements' are most often in the many millions of dollars. These reparations, once paid out, are most usually overseen by 'iwi trusts' (tribal trusts), and administered one would hope, for the betterment of all people within that tribal group. 

There has however, been a tendency for trusts overseeing these funds/ remunerations to corporatise itself, inasmuch that the Trust will start to "invest". The Trust thereby makes itself a CEO of The People's money, investing in all manner of offshore ventures and the International Stock Exchange. Great boasts of the wealth accumulated by these trusts are often heard. However, the common people for whom such benefit could have been available, receive no assistance at all. 

Those Maori 'representatives', signatories to a Trust, who themselves are at the 'top of the heap', deny their OWN PEOPLE the ability to get off the treadmill of debt slavery.  

This is an absolute travesty. Maori trustees of these trust funds, along with Maori politicians who operate under the same modus operandi are known in New Zealand by the scathing term "corporate Maori".  What they do is well known but the 'grass-roots' Maori people themselves have little recourse.

'Corporate Maori' have gone in again and re-tied themselves once more to Admiralty Law by the very act of "trading", ie: through realigning themselves to the UCC NZ-equivalent Commerce and Trade legislation. They have relegated their own people to perpetual debt slavery. These trustees have effectively put all tangata whenua back in exactly the same box. They deprive their own people of the ability to claim their OWN rights to Sovereignty as should be enabled, under The Treaty of Waitangi. It's very sad to see.

Who is the "Enemy"  ??

• It's a mis-informed agenda that tangata whenua be encouraged to push against the pakeha structures in the first instance. 

• It's towards THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THEIR OWN FUNDS that the war-cry should be heard. 

• In the second instance, WE ALL go against the British Admiralty structures that bind us ALL to debt slavery.   

We will ALL STAND therefore as THE ONE PEOPLE here in Aotearoa-New Zealand. 

This is required. No more and no less.  

Kia ora whanau.  

I DO stand with you....  but I can't DO that while you stand only for yourself  : (   

We must Stand Together.  

Otherwise, we all lose   : (

What is a Treaty Settlement?

Treaty settlements  (Commentary in red by Bronny NZ) A Treaty settlement is an agreement between The Crown [ie: "The Crown Corporation" City of London banksters] and a Maori claimant group to settle all of that claimant group's historical claims against The Crown. Claimant groups are usually iwi or large hapu (tribes and sub-tribes) that have a long-standing historical and cultural association with a particular area. Some very specific claims may result in agreements with smaller groups. Historical claims usually relate to "actions" [my speech marks], [ie: wholesale massacre] or "omissions" [oh sorry about that, I "forgot"] by The Crown in relation to the claimant group during the 19th and early 20th centuries, but they may include such actions or omissions up to 21 September 1992, (ie: the date of the “Sealord” Fisheries Settlement). Claims based on Crown "actions" or "omissions" after this date are known as "contemporary claims", and are dealt with through separate processes. A Treaty settlement is usually made up of the following: 1. Historical Account, Acknowledgements and Crown Apology   The Historical Account provides an outline of historical events that are agreed between The Crown and the claimant group. The Acknowledgements provide the basis for The Crown Apology [how good of them] !!!  - to the claimant group for its actions or inactions. 2. Cultural Redress Cultural redress provides claimant groups with a range of mechanisms that aim to: · Safeguard the claimant group's rights and access to customary food-gathering sources · Provide opportunities for input into the management or control or ownership of sites, areas or customary resources on Crown-owned land [ie: that's the banksters again laying claim to our lands] with which the claimant group has traditional and cultural associations. · Provide opportunities for developing future relationships with government departments in areas of importance to the claimant group [ie: the Trustees who get their pockets well and truly lined]. · Facilitate the development of future relationships with other agencies [ie: Agents of the Foreclosed on corporations which INCLUDES the NZ Government which as most of Maoridom knows, IS a corporation], such as local bodies, that play significant roles in the area to which the claimant group has traditional and cultural associations [what a sanitised bunch of bollox this is - 'divide and conquer' stratagems] · Provide recognition of traditional place-names by facilitating name changes to sites, for example Aoraki/ Mt Cook.  [a great 'token' gesture I must say... but hardly reaches into the heart of the matter] 3. Financial and Commercial Redress This is made up of an overall quantum or value in dollar terms agreed between The Crown [ie: I reiterate - "The Crown Corporation" City of London Banksters who OWN the queen. Liz curtseys to the Lord Mayor of the City of London and follows deferentially behind him whenever she enters "The City"]  - and the claimant group in settlement of their historical claims against the Crown.  My addition:   http://onepeoplespublictrustelucidated.blogspot.co.nz/2013/06/things-hidden-coming-into-light.html (continuing...) The quantum [I guess that means the large settlement sum] is taken by the claimant group in the form of cash or Crown-owned property [Yes. The City of London OWNS NZ land !!] or some combination of the two. For example, from of a total quantum of $10 million, a claimant group may receive $5 million in cash and the remainder in Crown-owned property.  The combination of cash and property is a matter for the claimant group to decide, but also depends on the extent of suitable Crown property holdings in the area relevant to the claimant group. The claimant group also may receive as part of the financial and commercial redress package a Right of First Refusal (RFR) to purchase certain Crown-owned property within a specified geographic area. This RFR usually lasts for a specific time-period. Deed of Settlement The settlement is expressed in detail in a document known as a Deed of Settlement. Legislation is usually required to fully implement the Deed of Settlement. Settlements are Final  As part of the settlement, the claimant group accepts that the settlement is fair [yeah right !!  Papatuanuku 'owns' herself !!!  "The Crown" has no claim !! ]  - and final and settles all of the historical claims of the claimant group, whether they have been lodged at the Waitangi Tribunal or not. Both The Crown [ie: "The Crown Corporation" City of London banksters] and the claimant group accept that it is not possible to fully compensate the claimant group for their grievances [Really?? And why would that be??]. Redress instead focuses on providing redress in recognition [ahhh... so it's just a 'token'] of the claimant group’s historical grievances, on restoring the relationship between the claimant group and The Crown [ie: We're shutting you down now and telling you we all have to play 'nicely' in the sandbox together!! ] - and on contributing to a claimant group’s economic development [well of course you are !! Since you're the bastards who are going to be getting richer off the taxes of any such "economic development" initiatives !! ]. http://www.ots.govt.nz/ Bastards !! The only mechanism that exists currently for us all at this juncture is the OPPT UCC filings.... with their complete nullifying of ALL CONTRACTS AND TREATIES.  If we can all swallow our pride and our anger and come into alignment with The Spirit of the OPPT filings which is ALL PEOPLE, ie: ONE TRIBE Y'ALL, we can get there on this.  If Maori are NOT willing to let Te Tiriti O Waitangi GO... To let it GO !!!  ~ We will simply end up going around and around and around in circles, here in Aotearoa-New Zealand.... and we'll  not get anywhere.   Now, I SEE a way out that is honourable for ALL peoples.   What say you ???

The SAME wairua runs through us all.

Heather Tucci-Jarraf calls this "Eternal Essence Embodied".

There are no differences.  We ARE "The One People".

Please don't make "The One People" the vehicle by which you think you can claim your Maori Sovereignty...  because we need "People Sovereignty" for ALL PEOPLE !!!  NO AGENDAS !!!

It's "The Crown Corporation" that divides us.

Let's figure that out....  And let's get on with it   <3  <3  <3

Please....

Arohanui
Bron.

The Pope's 11 July 2013 Decree - Comes Into Effect 1 September 2013

This article now has an "update" of what's REALLY going on with this "Apostolic Letter".

For some VERY INTERESTING twists to this story, please go to the following link:

http://onepeoplespublictrustelucidated.blogspot.co.nz/2013/09/important-update-popes-decree-comes.html


9 August 2013 Article: The Pope's 11 July 2013 Decree - Comes Into Effect 1 September 2013

The first item in this post is an edited version of what D. posted on "Removing The Shackles" blog on Thursday, 25 July 2013. This message was sent from a friend to Heather, which she then forwarded to D. A question is posed by D:  Is the Pope's decree about to cause mass resignations? Already announced are:

(1) Ben Bernanke is resigning the Federal Reserve effective September 1, 2013.

(2) One of the Federal Reserve Governors has resigned effective September 1, 2013.

(3) Janet Napolitano (Homeland Security) has resigned effective September 1, 2013.

In a nutshell:

The Most Holy Francis issued an Apostolic Letter on July 11 and effective 1 September 2013 that effectively strips away the immunity of all judges, attorneys, government officials and all entities established under the Roman Curia. Note: All corporations are established under the Roman Curia. All of these "persons" can now be held accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, for the unlawful restrictions of the liberties of the divine spirit incarnate (note: divine spirit embodies humanity); and for failure to settle the accounts and for continued prosecution of claims already settled, and so on...

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.co.nz/2013/07/popes-decree-about-to-cause-mass.html

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio_20130711_organi-giudiziari_en.html   (following)

APOSTOLIC LETTER ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS ON THE JURISDICTION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES OF VATICAN CITY STATE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS In our times, the common good is increasingly threatened by transnational organized crime, the improper use of the markets and of the economy, as well as by terrorism. It is therefore necessary for the international community to adopt adequate legal instruments to prevent and counter criminal activities, by promoting international judicial cooperation on criminal matters. In ratifying numerous international conventions in these areas, and acting also on behalf of Vatican City State, the Holy See has constantly maintained that such agreements are effective means to prevent criminal activities that threaten human dignity, the common good and peace. With a view to renewing the Apostolic See’s commitment to cooperate to these ends, by means of this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio, I establish that: 1. The competent Judicial Authorities of Vatican City State shall also exercise penal jurisdiction over: a) crimes committed against the security, the fundamental interests or the patrimony of the Holy See; b) crimes referred to: - in Vatican City State Law No. VIII, of 11 July 2013, containing Supplementary Norms on Criminal Law Matters;  - in Vatican City State Law No. IX, of 11 July 2013, containing Amendments to the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code;  when such crimes are committed by the persons referred to in paragraph 3 below, in the exercise of their functions; c) any other crime whose prosecution is required by an international agreement ratified by the Holy See, if the perpetrator is physically present in the territory of Vatican City State and has not been extradited. 2. The crimes referred to in paragraph 1 are to be judged pursuant to the criminal law in force in Vatican City State at the time of their commission, without prejudice to the general principles of the legal system on the temporal application of criminal laws. 3. For the purposes of Vatican criminal law, the following persons are deemed “public officials”: a) members, officials and personnel of the various organs of the Roman Curia and of the Institutions connected to it.  b) papal legates and diplomatic personnel of the Holy See.  c) those persons who serve as representatives, managers or directors, as well as persons who even de facto manage or exercise control over the entities directly dependent on the Holy See and listed in the registry of canonical juridical persons kept by the Governorate of Vatican City State;  d) any other person holding an administrative or judicial mandate in the Holy See, permanent or temporary, paid or unpaid, irrespective of that person’s seniority. 4. The jurisdiction referred to in paragraph 1 comprises also the administrative liability of juridical persons arising from crimes, as regulated by Vatican City State laws. 5. When the same matters are prosecuted in other States, the provisions in force in Vatican City State on concurrent jurisdiction shall apply. 6. The content of article 23 of Law No. CXIX of 21 November 1987, which approves the Judicial Order of Vatican City State remains in force. This I decide and establish, anything to the contrary notwithstanding. I establish that this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio will be promulgated by its publication in L’Osservatore Romano, entering into force on 1 September 2013. Given in Rome, at the Apostolic Palace, on 11 July 2013, the first of my Pontificate. FRANCISCUS
© Copyright - Libreria Editrice Vaticana

See also:
11 July Apostolic Letter
http://www.news.va/en/news/apostolic-letter-issued-motu-proprio-on-the-juri-2
8 August Press Release 

http://www.news.va/en/news/press-release-on-new-motu-proprio   

Press release on new Motu proprio
2013-08-08 Vatican Radio

The Holy See Press Office has released a communiqué on the new Motu proprio of Pope Francis concerning “the prevention and countering of money laundering, the financing of terrorism, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.”

Below, please find the full text of the Holy See Press Office communiqué:

COMMUNIQUÉ OF THE HOLY SEE PRESS OFFICE

MOTU PROPRIO OF POPE FRANCIS

FOR THE PREVENTION AND COUNTERING OF MONEY LAUNDERING,

THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM

AND THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

1. Today the Holy Father Francis has issued a Motu Proprio for:

• the prevention and countering of money laundering, 
• the financing of terrorism and 
• the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

2. Pursuant to the steps already taken by Benedict XVI in this area with the Motu Proprio of 30 December 2010 for preventing and countering illegal activities in the areas of finance and currency, today’s Motu Proprio reaffirms the Holy See’s commitment to the goal of:

• preventing and countering money laundering, 
• the financing of terrorism and 
• the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

3. In particular, the present Motu Proprio:

- broadens the application of the relevant Vatican laws to the Dicasteries of the Roman Curia and to other institutes and entities dependent on the Holy See, as well as to non-profit organizations enjoying juridical personality in canon law and based in the Vatican City State.

- strengthens the supervisory and regulatory function of the Financial Information Authority;

- establishes the function of prudential supervision over entities habitually engaged in financial activities, in response to a recommendation of the MONEYVAL Committee of the Council of Europe, and assigns that function to the Financial Information Authority;

- establishes the Financial Security Committee, whose Statutes are appended to the Motu Proprio, for the purpose of coordinating the competent authorities of the Holy See and the Vatican City State in the area of prevention and countering of money laundering, the financing of terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

From the Vatican, 8 August 2013

http://www.news.va/en/news/press-release-on-new-motu-proprio

Wednesday, June 26th 2013 - 16:02 UTC

Francis names special commission to review activities of the scandal-plagued Vatican bank

Pope Francis has set up a special commission to review the activities of the scandal-plagued Vatican bank to ensure that it operated in “harmony” with the mission of the Catholic Church, the Vatican confirmed.  

The appointment of the five-member panel, which includes four prelates and a woman Harvard professor, is the boldest move yet by Francis to get to grips with a bank that embarrassed the church for decades.

The Institute for Works of Religion (IOR) as the bank is formally known, has long been tarnished by accusations that it has failed to meet international transparency standards intended to combat money laundering and tax evasion.

The Vatican said in a statement the commission would enable Francis “to know better the judicial position and the activities of the Institute to allow an improved harmonization with the mission of the universal church”.

It said the commission would have full powers to obtain all documentation and data necessary although the powers of existing regulators would not be affected.

Pope Francis has laid great emphasis on removing an image of privilege from Church operations and IOR's new president Ernst von Freyberg has begun a review of all its accounts and activities.

Italian magistrates are investigating the bank on suspicion of money laundering, a charge the bank denies.

In the eighties IOR was involved in a series of complicated financial operations with other banks (Banco Ambrosiano one of them) and mafia related organizations which ended with the Vatican institution bankrupt and Carlos Calvi called “God’s banker” hanging from Blackfriars Bridge in London, which Scotland Yard catalogued as suicide.

At the time the IOR was managed by US Archbishop Paul Marcinkus.

http://en.mercopress.com/2013/06/26/francis-names-special-commission-to-review-activities-of-scandal-plagued-vatican-bank

... And another point of view that came across my path today from Kevin Annett, 2 September 2013:

An Irreverent Critique of the "Apostolic Letter"

Published on Aug 30, 2013
by infiniLor

Would You Trust Al Capone to Police Himself? Kevin Annett unmasks the latest papal deception known as the Apostolic Letter, which co-opts and nullifies the applicability of international law to the catholic church, and criminalizes critics and whistle blowers within the church. Pope Francis is safeguarding the church's criminal regime of child trafficking, rape and coverup under the guise of "reform". Issued August 30, 2013. www.itccs.org

For much more from Kevin, please go to:

http://onepeoplespublictrustelucidated.blogspot.co.nz/2013/09/important-update-popes-decree-comes.html

For further background please see these articles:

http://co-creatingournewearth.blogspot.co.nz/2012/06/catholic-paedophiles-named-and-shamed.html

http://co-creatingournewearth.blogspot.co.nz/2012/06/canada-genocide-under-catholic-church.html

http://co-creatingournewearth.blogspot.co.nz/2012/06/historic-lawsuit-to-be-filed-against.html

http://co-creatingournewearth.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/sign-this-petition-718-200000-signed-so.html

http://co-creatingournewearth.blogspot.co.nz/2013/02/admission-of-guilt-pope-other-catholic.html

http://co-creatingournewearth.blogspot.co.nz/2013/02/pope-seeks-immunity-and-protection-on.html