Roman Church Pope assumes ownership of all Land, People and Souls!

Reposted:  The Legal Ownership of All Souls by the Vatican… Since 1306!

Unam Sanctam is one of the most frightening documents of history and the one most quoted as the primary document of the popes claiming their global power. It is an express trust deed. The last line reads:  “Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” It is not only the first trust deed in history but also the largest trust ever conceived, as it claims the whole planet and everything on it, conveyed in trust.

Triple Crown of Ba’al, aka the Papal Tiara and Triregnum

In 1302 Pope Boniface issued his infamous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam––the first Express Trust. He claimed control over the whole planet which made him “King of the world”. In celebration, he commissioned a gold-plated headdress in the shape of a pinecone, with an elaborate crown at its base. The pinecone is an ancient symbol of fertility and one traditionally associated with Ba’al as well as the Cult of Cybele.  It also represents the pineal gland in the centre of our brains––crystalline in nature–– which allows us access to Source, hence, the 13-foot tall pinecone in Vatican Square. Think about why the Pontiffs would idolize a pinecone.

The 1st Crown of Crown Land

Pope Boniface VIII

Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will creating a Deceased Estate, was created by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, through the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex. This is only one of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit “For a perpetual remembrance.” This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real Property, from the Express Trust Unam Sanctam, to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity. Hence, all land is claimed as “crown land”.  This 1st Crown is represented by the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial entitlements and rights on the land.

The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth

The second Crown was created in 1481 with the papal bull Aeterni Regis, meaning “Eternal Crown”, by Sixtus IV, being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of testamentary trusts.

This Papal Bull created the “Crown of Aragon”, later known as the Crown of Spain, and is the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff. Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the “Union of Crowns”, or Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot. The Crown was finally lost by England in 1975, when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I, where it remains to this day.  This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born and, by the sale of the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving us of ownership of our flesh and condemning us to perpetual servitude, as a Roman person, or slave.

The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See

The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III, through the papal bull Convocation, also meant to open the Council of Trent. It is the third and final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all “lost souls”, lost to the See.  The Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and “reaping” of lost souls. The Crown was lost in 1816, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and granted to the Temple Bar which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown. The Bar Associations have since been responsible for administering the “reaping” of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.

This 3rd Crown is represented by the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is baptized. It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate––title to the soul––to the church or Registrar. Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, we will be denied legal standing and will be treated as things––cargo without souls––upon which the BAR is now legally able to enforce Maritime law.

The Cestui Que Vie Trust

A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictional concept. It is a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II, through the CQV Act of 1666, wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions, by which such a Trust may be formed, were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages, and private companies. The original purpose of a CQV Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs, or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent, and present, before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes, or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a CQV Trust, as pronounced by these canons, is false and automatically null and void.

A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a CQV Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in a CQV Trust on his behalf, he do not “own” the CQV Trust; he is only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the CQV Trust choose to provide.  As all CQV Trusts are created on presumption, based upon original purpose and function, such a Trust cannot be created if these presumptions can be proven not to exist.

Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.

The Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly:

1. convey the beneficial entitlements of the child, as Beneficiary, into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights to Real Property; and,
2. claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the baby’s feet onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood, as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record which is a promissory note, converted into a slave bond, sold to the private reserve bank of the estate, and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate CQV Trust, per child, owned by the bank. When the promissory note reaches maturity and the bank is unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and is monetized as currency issued in series against the CQV Trust.
3. claim the child’s soul via the Baptismal Certificate. Since 1540 and the creation of the 1st CQV Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III, 1540, when a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued, the parents have gifted, granted, and conveyed the soul of the baby to a “3rd” CQV Trust owned by Roman Cult, which has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since. Since 1815, this 3rd Crown of the Roman Cult and 3rd CQV Trust representing Ecclesiastical Property has been managed by the BAR as the reconstituted “Galla” responsible, as Grim Reapers, for reaping the souls.

Each Cestui Que Vie Trust, created since 1933, represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the three claims of property of the Roman Cult: Real Property (on Earth), Personal Property (body), and Ecclesiastical Property (soul). Each corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the BAR Courts: corporate commercial law (judge is the ‘landlord’), maritime and canon law (judge is the banker), and Talmudic law (judge is the priest).

What is the real power of a court ‘judge’?

Given what has been revealed about the foundations of Roman Law, what is the real hidden power of a judge when we face court?  Is it their superior knowledge of process and procedure or of magic? Or is it something simpler and far more obvious?

It is unfortunate that much of the excitement about Estates and Executors has deliberately not revealed that an Estate, by definition, has to belong to a Trust––to be specific, a Testamentary Trust or CQV Trust. When we receive legal paper or have to appear in court, it is these same CQV Trusts which have our rights converted into the property contained within them. Instead of being the Trustee, or the Executor, or Administrator, we are merely the Beneficiary of each CQV Trust, granted only beneficial and equitable use of certain property, never legal title. So if the Roman Legal System assumes we are merely the beneficiary of these CQV Trusts, when we go to court, who represents the Trustee and Office of Executor? We all know that all cases are based upon the judge’s discretion which often defies procedures, statutes, and maxims of law. Well, they are doing what any Trustee or Executor, administering a trust in the presence of the beneficiary, can do under Roman Law and all the statutes, maxims, and procedures are really for show because under the principles of Trust Law, as first formed by the Roman Cult, a Trustee has a wide latitude, including the ability to correct any procedural mistakes, by obtaining the implied or tacit consent of the beneficiary, to obviate any mistakes. The judge is the real and legal Name. The judge is the trust, itself. We are the mirror image to them––the ghost––the dead. It is high sorcery, trickery, and subterfuge that has remained “legal” for far too long. Spread the word.

Original source: Stop the Pirates
Via: TABU

The Cestui Que Vie Act (1666) - People Owned Under Old English Law

What is the Cestui Que Vie Act (1666) and why should you care?

Here is the Act itself - unrepealed.

In 1666 in London, during the black plague and on the three days the Great Fire of London burned, English Parliament enacted an act, behind closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666. The Great Fire was one of the biggest smokescreens in history - literally!

Video: Cest.mpeg

Published on Jul 1, 2012
A video about how the gov stole everything from the people.

Alive Yet Dead And Lost At Sea: The Cestui Que Vie Trust

Published on Jul 28, 2015
From the moment we come into this world our birth certificate is signed by our parents and a bond is formed to the federal reserve. It is even printed on bond paper. Most are unaware that once the certificate is signed we are viewed as dead soulless beings and this has an integral role to play in the courts as well as in understanding the corruption of the cestui que vie trust. Sources are on this YouTube video description.

All men and women were declared dead, 

lost at sea/beyond the sea. 

The State thenceforth took custody of everybody and their property into a Trust, the State became the Trustee/ Husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man [or woman] comes back to reclaim those titles and can also claim damages. (Reclaim using UCC 1 and PPSA)

The use of CAPITAL LETTERS used in a NAME: When CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a NAME this always refers to a LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION, COMPANY or CORPORATION no exceptions. e.g. John DOE or Doe, JANE (PASSPORT, DRIVER LICENSE, MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE and BIRTH CERTIFICATE)

CEST TUI QUE TRUST: This is a commonly known trust cited in NEW ZEALAND, AUSTRALIA or STRAWMAN common term, in USA or CANADA is a LEGAL ENTITY/ FICTION created and owned by the GOVERNMENT whom created it. I repeat owned by the GOVERNMENT.

Legally, we are considered to be a FICTION, a concept or idea expressed 
as a NAME, a symbol. That LEGAL PERSON has no consciousness; it is a juristic PERSON, EN LEGIS, a NAME/ word written on a piece of paper.

This traces back to 1666.
London is a state, just like Vatican is a state, just like Washington DC is a state. 

The Crown is an unincorporated association. 

Why unincorporated??  Because it's private.  The "Temple Bar" is in London.  Every lawyer called to "The Bar" swears allegiance to the Temple Bar. You can't get called without swearing this allegiance. 

The Crown already owns North America and everything in it.

Please also see the article: Who IS "The Crown" Anyway? How We Got Conned!

A Literal Translation of "Cestui Que Vie"

"Cestui Que Vie" Act (1666)

I have been thinking about the literal translation and the 'hidden layers' of meaning in the phrase, "Cestui Que Vie". It looks like French basically... So this needs a bit more digging given that it was 'a type of French' being used on English shores in LAW !!  Let's follow a little more research...

Hypothesis # 1:  That this phrase draws mainly on the French

From French:   c'est = this is        tu = you     que = that       vie = living/ lives

Could this little phrase mean:
"Is this you that lives?" (posed as a question) or "Is it that you are living?"
"This is you that is living" or "This is you that lives" (posed as a statement).

Is the name of this Act intimating that it actually KNOWS you are DEAD in law (a fictional entity), but that it forces you to claim that you are living.  This is one of the first things you will be asked in court:  "Is this you?"

The judge asks:

"Is this ('name') who you are?" 

We don't REALLY know what he's asking, so we say, "Yes".  From now on, we all need to say,

"NO" !!

T
That NAME is NOT who you are...
Please continue.


Hypothesis #2

Here's what Google Search turned up: The Norman Conquest and Middle English (1100-1500) ... The new overlords spoke a dialect of Old French known as Anglo-Norman.  Could this explain the word, 'estui' ??

1. Old French estui = prison, from estuier = to guard, from Vulgar Latin *estudire = to treat carefully, from Latin studium = study.

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/etui

2. stew /stjuː/n brit - a fishpond or fishtank, an artificial oyster bed. Etymology: 14th Century: from Old French estui, from estoier to shut up, confine, ultimately from Latin studium study.
http://www.wordreference.com/definition/stew

3. Also: Synonyms = worry, suffer, be anxious, obsess, brood, fret, agonize, feel uneasy, go through the mill, be in anguish

http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/stew

Hypothesis #3 - And I think, probably the most correct meaning of the phrase, but not discounting the above Hypotheses:

Cestui que /ˈsɛstwi ˈkeɪ/, also cestuy que, is a shortened version of "cestui a que use le feoffment fuit fait", literally, "The person for whose use the feoffment was made."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cestui_que

For further study:

"...In feudal England a feoffment could only be made of a fee (or "fief"), which is an estate in land, that is to say an ownership of rights over land, rather than ownership of the land itself, the only true owner of which was the monarch under his allodial title."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feoffment

"... Allodial title is related to the concept of land held "in allodium", or land ownership by occupancy and defense of the land. Historically, much of land was uninhabited and could therefore be held "in allodium".[1]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allodial_title

"... Property which was occupied and held by force against others was held in "allodium". Basically, that means "without any restriction, of any kind or nature, whatsoever". People would come across unoccupied, vacant land and would simply make it theirs. There was no one around, no one to say that they could have it, no one to grant permission, no one to sign a deed. In this regard, "might was right". If you had the property, and could defend it against others, then it was yours in "allodium". Since there was no place to register your title, it was simply acknowledged that you held allodial title. That simply meant that you had no deed.// To a certain extent, the concept of "allodial title" is just a legal fiction. It doesn't really exist in the legal system. It is simply a method of comparing it to other properties and helping to understand the differences between it and "fee simple"."
http://www.remaxwest.com/blog/p/what-is-allodial-title

It appears Cestui is Anglo-Norman - an Old French-based language. Could it be that this phrase is actually a 'word game' ??  I would not be at all surprised if it were considered a 'witty' and clever bit of repartee on the part of the law-makers... To blend the C'est (it is) with the 'estui' (prison), encapsulating their intent for humanity... which WAS undoubtedly to IMPRISON the whole person within his/ her OWN body. Very clever.

You'll remember that this was the time of William Shakespeare - the great pun-maker, whose last play 'The Tempest' (c.1625), was said to be an analogy of the turbulent social & political times. Shakespeare was heartily enjoyed by the people for his double entendre and proliferation of puns throughout his plays. Could it be that these law-makers were writing laws in a manner reflecting these social and literary preferences to be 'very clever'. "Cestui" when seen in this way, is a very witty, almost charming turn of phrase. Very clever indeed. And better still, the common person had no idea whatsoever the meaning was... as this lovely bit of C 21st contemporary poetry points out, author's name not known:


In 1665 Britain was infected with the deadly plague -
In 1666 a great fire then did rage -
But while London was burning down, yes let me repeat that; WHILE LONDON WAS BURNING DOWN -
The parliment of the day decided to hold a special sessions, where they all sat down -
For the right time had come for them to now set in motion -
There would never be a better chance, time, opportunity, amongst all that commotion -
And what they did truly amazed me, you won’t believe what they did you see…

They pasted through the “Cestui Que Vie Act” of 1666 -
Which today STILL EXISTS -
So please, have no doubt, for what this Act is all about -
Is because of the great plague and fire, now hear me:

THEY DIDN’T KNOW WHO WAS ALIVE OR DEAD – Truly.

So they passed it through first in Latin -
So the commoners couldn’t read it -
So they knew not what was happening;
Then they decided to print it in French…
As if that’s going to make any sense?!

For the only ones who could read it were the well off you see -
Who had the right bloodline or ancestry -
So, believe you me, until you tell them you are actually ALIVE, we are all DEAD!!!
Go let your brain cells now figure that out; inside your unique head.

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2012/09/22/legally-dead-island-cestui-que-vie-act-1666/


These guys knew what they were writing into law. The common people did NOT use Anglo-Norman in common language, NOR Latin (the language of the church) by the 1600 AD. The People used Chaucerian (actual) English in daily life by 1500 AD, and Shakespearian English by the end of the 1600 AD ... which WE still understand in our modern times.

On an 'energetic' or spiritual level:
The Judge, through his energetic ancestral line back to the Temple Bar draws that energy into the court room that ties us up as a fictional tradeable entity, nothing more than a commodity of the courts. They draw on the energy of the Bar of old, and there we are tied, whipped, beaten, disemboweled and beheaded... under that same Spirit as occurred at the Temple Bar.

In parallel: Those "officials" in the legal system have also deconstructed 'me', dehumanised, made me an unattached head to a "strawman" and tell me that "I" no longer exist.Then this gives THEM the "right" to claim all that I have including my own person. The third link here is of the greatest interest.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/étui

http://aggslanguage.wordpress.com/a-brief-history-of-the-english-language/

http://dickens.stanford.edu/dickens/archive/tale/print_issue3_gloss.html

I don't want to believe the extent of the EVIL that those 'law makers' knowingly committed against the uneducated masses.  And I think this is what they did !! So in using the Anglo-Norman 'estui' = a prison, with the verb contraction C'est = it is..  This certainly comes across as quite a 'sophisticated' little joke !! ... for ALL except to whom it applied.

Does the name of this law in literal translation really say, "That is a living prison' ?? - referring to the human body as "that".  I would not be at all surprised if this is a part of the meaning of this phrase...  pointing to a most clever prison, indeed  : (

In 1725, Hogarth began a number of engravings that would act as illustrations for a new edition of the seventeenth-century poet Samuel Butler's Hudibras. This was an epic poem in three parts that satirised seventeenth-century Puritans against the backdrop of the English Civil War. Burning Ye Rumps at Temple Bar is the eleventh plate of this series. The image refers to the protests against the 'rump parliament' by inhabitants of the Temple Bar area. The 'rump parliament' was originally created in December 1648, with the aim of removing those members of the Long Parliament who were in favour of a negotiation with Charles I. Thus, the term 'rump' referred to the remnants of the legitimate parliament. 

The engraving is based on an historic event in which factions of the London populace poured into the streets in protest of the reinstatement of a 'rump parliament' that followed the death of Oliver Cromwell, the Lord Protector of the Commonwealth, in 1659. Members of the mob roasted rumps of beef in the street, as they voiced their displeasure with the chant, "No More Rump." Hogarth's illustration, taking place on Butcher's Row, a street just north of the Strand that was lined with butchers' shops, is dominated by a tumultuous crowd. In the foreground, protestors carry a plum effigy of a Member of Parliament through the crowd, and layered behind are representations of members of the 'rump,' burning and hanging from the buildings, and the skyline is dotted with the heads of traitors fixed on spikes. Bonfires are scattered across the image, with rioters burning the rumps of meat that symbolised their dislike of the 'rump parliament,' and acted as an assertion of masculinity and plebeian anarchy. The bustling crowd scene is juxtaposed with the linear facades of the buildings. The rhythmic layering of these buildings ultimately leads the viewer's eye to the central landmark of the image, the arch of Temple Bar, which is apocryphal in this context, as construction did not begin on this structure until 1669. Even before the arch was erected, Temple Bar marked the barrier from the Western point of the City of London to Westminster and was representative of two different urban spaces. Traditionally, the monarch would stop at Temple Bar before entering the City to be greeted by the Lord Mayor, a ceremonial act that marked the symbolic union of monarch and city. Though the arch demarcates two contrasting spaces, these spaces are symbolically brought together through the crowd that has joined forces in protest of the 'rump parliament.' 

-Francesca Mainman

http://www.york.ac.uk/history-of-art/virtual-exhibition/26.html

40 Questions Answered by Heather (OPPT Trustee)

Thank you "Wake Up World" for collating these questions... the original Q & A with Heather can be found on "Removing the Shackles". Also, I produced an edited version of this Q & A (link below). This is the full version... we can back-track a bit now, now that some of the fundamental things are starting to fit into place ~ such as the Courtesy Notices    :  )

http://onepeoplespublictrustelucidated.blogspot.co.nz/2013/03/oppt-q-with-heather-tucci-jarraf.html

http://wakeup-world.com/2013/03/06/oppt-questions-answers-by-trustee-heather-one-peoples-public-trust/

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/oppt-questions-answers-march-5th.html

40 OPPT Questions Answered by Trustee Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf

6th March 2013

Question #1: Ok what I think is people are worried about who is in charge and who’s going to be dictating what they can spend their new funds on and the properties they acquire will be in the hands of the Trustees…

Heather: you are in charge of your own value…spend it on what you choose by your free will without damaging another…it is unlawful and illegal for any one to dictate to any one else against their free will …even if you damage another, the remedy is already set…you are responsible and liable for damages - that is what we have been telling the people on the planet…

BE conscious… BE responsible… 
everything you DO You are responsible and liable for… 
not any other’s DO’ing and BE’ing…

Question #2: Is the National Security Act of 1947 going to shut down? I heard there was a lot of illegal operation, black operation to support the parallel government that runs behind National Security Act of 1947.

Heather: PTW [Powers that Were] put the whole planet under UCC…the people took it back the same way it was taken…as it is bound so shall it be unbound.

Question #3: HEATHER, please respond to this video when able. ALERT on OPPT (On Peoples Public Trust)  - video removed 

Heather: it’s data of the Absolute Data. Beautiful contrasts have been becoming visible and more obvious every day! It is the moment NOW for all to make some choices based on the data of NOW…. and then from there, more data becomes visible and more obvious and more choices are made….etc. CHOICE NOW? Are you going to BE responsible and liable for your BE’ing and DO’ing? or NOT? If you are…then your every thought, word, and action of DO’ing and BE’ing protects and guards that. If NOT…then your every thought, word and action does not protect and guard your BE’ing and DO’ing…which one do you think the PTW are focused on right now?…have always been focused on and tried to increase the numbers of?

Question #4: Heather, I had someone mention to me that a cestui que vie trust is very similar to the OPPT filings.

Heather: That was probably the most boring and complex part of the investigations. we did the investigation and boots in the trenches on that matter though so that we could make sure that no one else would have to ever wade through that crap again…all that is left is BE’ing and each is responsible for them self…the sole trustee, custodian, administrator, beneficiary, and executor of their BE’ing. 

Question #5: It doesn’t matter that trust has been crushed by OPPT.

Heather: It was collapsed by REGISTRATION of the BE’ing…because that collapsed the straw man which was the PTW’s construct “state of body” to enslave…now you are all just “states of body of BE’ing”

Question #6: Has been coming up regarding student loans, mortgages, etc.

Heather: Almost every loan, if not every loan, is fraud… No loan was made. If no loan was made then no debt could lawfully or legally exist. Was a loan made? Here is what they would have to produce in order testability that a loan was made that you may have a debt:

1. Produce documentation of prior title, ownership and rights to the money they purportedly loaned you;

2. produce documentation of the history and origin of funds that they purportedly had prior title, ownership and rights to that they purportedly loaned you (banking requires 3 generations at least if not all the way back to issuance/creation of the alleged funds…this is why banks issue a letter of origin/history of funds);

3. produce documentation of the actual transaction and transfer of said funds (prior title, ownership, and rights) from loaner to borrower (invoicing/receipts) there is a difference between a “loan” and “debt”, conceptually and factually.

Look up the definitions of loan and debt. [Look up the] difference between statement and invoice…only an invoice has to be paid…however they would first have to show that they made you a loan…if no loan, each invoice is fraud, mail fraud, etc.

Question #7: Does the UCC apply to countries besides America?

Heather: Regarding other countries saying the UCC is not applicable to them. The Prime Commercial Registry is broken down into branches internationally [like a franchise or department]. UCC is one of them, through the Principal Agent Doctrine, UCC 1-103, Any and all state, national, and international equivalents… All were served, noticed, and registered by entering the Prime Commercial Registry from any one of its branches/franchises/departments…OPPT entered in through Washington, D.C. … in UK…the branch/franchise is London City. And every country has their own…they hide them well….just Google Commercial Code, Commercial Law, Commercial Regulation, to ferret [find] out the particulars for any specific country …however as stated above it was already lawfully and legally taken through the branch right to the Prime Commercial Registry and is applicable to each and every branch/franchise/department of that Prime Commercial Registry on the planet.

Question #8: When will the CVACS be available for new community like enterprises such as a farm purchase for an eco-community?

Heather: I am working on CVACS now to get the 193 set up…then the first system of assistance that will go live after CVACS established is the system of treasury. The rest of the systems of assistance will follow that first system of assistance.

The sole purpose and order for the CVACS is to get Absolute Data on the Table and guard the space so that the people can choose by their free will what resonates with in each of them….the purpose of the CVACS is not to tell the people what to Do or how to BE…that is why the OPPT spent so much energy and time (has it really only been two months if that?) on focusing the attention on BE’ing…the energy of each of your BE’ing is what fills the CVAC, giving it life! J

Question #9: What is the 193 CVAC setup?

Heather: To make the transition from what you thought you all had to what you do have…we mirrored the old geographical locations for branches that assist the people wherever they may decide to venture…there are basically 195 registered corporations operating under the guise of government…COUNTRIES in the old system… the Vatican was one of the corporations…but for specific reasons that was not included in the 194 CVAC authorized BRANCHES.

Question #10: Can someone explain to me what the oppt logo means please and is Heather a member of the UCC as I have been told that for any UCC documents or filings to work you have to be a member.

Heather: It evolved throughout inception visibly giving notice of where we were at…the current logo has all separations recognized and put with in Circle of Absolute Truth…including the Commercial Registry. Oh, are you talking about David Wynn Miller’s data? That data was changed as of May 4, 2000, and returned to the true absolute owners, the one people of the planet, equally, December 21, 2011…so, yep, we are all owners of it and can choose to DO with it as we see fit     

Question #11: If the UCC has been foreclosed on why is it still operating? 2) why has heather not started a court case or hearing for the foreclosure against the UCC?

Heather: Regarding protocols and delivery address for hard copy wet-ink originals…getting that prepared now…please…a little patience you beautiful DO’ers…it is the weekend and four little ones that I am having fun making crazy…or maybe they are making me crazy…lovin’ mutual givin’! (chuckle)

Question #12: Is the OPPT is a public trust?

Heather: Its fundamentally and structurally different. it is a trust of creation…when you, I or any of the others were created…it was between each of us and Creator…creator domicile the value in the body…you operate the body and are responsible for the value…you are a trust…I am a trust…each of the others is a trust….we are all the trust…some are asking “who appointed those three”…as Trusts/Trustees of our Self’s…we each took responsibility and liability for our BE’ing and DO’ing and were going back in for the value commandeered and stolen…and recognized the Absolute Truth that all others were equal…so rather than just DO for our self’s…we also reconfirmed, re-verified, and DO guard, protect and preserve the Absolute Truth and opportunity for each of the others…for the others to make the choice whether they BE responsible and liable for their self and value by their free will choice…Does that clear that question up? There are moments when one of the three Trustee’s skills are more honed and that Trustee has usually rotated to the front of the guard to shield or highlight the appropriate data … Sometimes it is all three of us together…sometimes it is all three of us with the people together …right now…the Trustees are guarding the space from the PTS so that the people can remember how to BE and DO … And one day perhaps the tool of OPPT can be retired (heart) because every one is responsible and liable for all that they BE and DO.

Question #13: Their contention, that calling it a Public Trust, does not necessarily make it a Public Trust. Therein lies the dispute. They insist it is more like a cestui que.

Heather: “great!!!!!!! If there is a dispute, error, or falsity make AND deliver a duly verified sworn DECLARATION OF REBUTTAL to the duly verified, sworn and REGISTERED OPPT DECLARATION OF FACTS, point by point, with specificity and particularity, with full responsibility and liability, under the penalty of perjury under any law you identify, that the forgoing is true and accurate, signed by your wet-ink signature.”

Question #14: I was told that Heather is going to arrange to speak with Winston Shrout soon, if not today – about OPPT.

Heather: He only wants to talk in private no recording…after he started with public and transparency…I already offered to talk…transparently, but he is now not willing…

I don’t even have a number for Winston…I looked for a few the other day and found some website that looks to be his…so I just wrote an open letter instead giving him and the people more data in regards to the main issue of the “lien”/”levy” tools we determined were not applicable…still looking for a number…but if he doesn’t want to talk now…and I am not up for a 3 hour like happened with Adnan and Mike (face palm)…there is other DO’ing happening right now that I do focus on for the systems.

( inserted note by D: When a friend of ours approached Mr. Shrout to do a recorded conversation with Heather and himself, he received a reply from Linda Joslin stating that Winston would not do any more radio shows about/on OPPT- which in my opinion is sorta humorous…)

Heather:  funny…thought Winston wasn’t doing any shows on/regarding OPPT?

http://freedomclubusa.com/oppt

Heather: THIS will bring a great data festival!!!!!! DHS, inclusive of Navy, old hitters, undercover agents within “patriot” movements, etc…. (heart)…perhaps this will be the catalyst for disclosure about the corporate/BANK/BIS/UN initiated movements and programs, including Arab Spring, OCCUPY WALL STREET, Watt riots, Seattle World Trade Center riots, etc….funnnnn!!!

(inserted note by D: Charlie Miller will also be on this radio show with Winston Shrout. According to the data I have been receiving, this will most likely be a last ditch effort to try to convince the world that he should be the boss of OPPT….. even though, he refused to sign a Bond to be Self-Transparent, Self-Responsible, Self-Accountable and Personally Liable for all that he does as a Trustee without condition, as the other Trustees- Heather, Randall, and Caleb- have signed.)

Question #15: what does it mean to this ‘process’ that the state filings from WA were removed from the commercial registry – citing (in that letter you posted) that it’s against policy to place a lien on public officials, etc. (even though a lien wasn’t filed on public officials)?

Heather: you can “enter” things in the commercial registry from any of its branches, state and international portals…that remedy was entered from two portals in that example state (WA) and international (WA DC)…Caleb’s was done using WA DC and OREGON, and Randall’s was done using WA and WA DC. The remedy presevered had specific process to do…if any part of that process is removed, then the whole remedy would be worthless…so the PTW thought at least.

Heather: except that it wasn’t a lien…so there was no basis to destroy/remove any part of the process of remedy. However, when they did it…the destroyed the preservation of remedy and rendered the system by their own actions, illegal and unlawful as a matter of law, fact and public policy.

Question #16: Heather, how do I go about creating a CVAC for a heart repair business? We are pulling out of February’s funky energy, and moving into March madness… I have an established track record of fixing broken hearts. This week’s incoming energy has been pounding me… I retired from the heart repair business in 2007, because I was worn-out and heart-broken, myself. I have been wondering about the direction I should take for the last 18+ months. This evening, I received clarity. How do I create a CVAC for a heart repair business?

Heather: You ARE the CVAC…your knowingly, willingly and intentionally BE’ing responsible and liable for all that you DO = value and any specific DO’ing, inclusive of creating a heart repair business, IS, and those you CO-DO or DO for in that business, you are liable to them and them to you as mutually agreed/contracted…if you feel you need a transition tool from that old paradigm of “licensing” under the private corporations that were foreclosed…one option is to REGISTER your business on the COMMERCIAL REGISTRY…BE’ing’s as secured party and the “entity” as Debtor party…THEN you can use that registration UCC File No. as the entities “IDENTITY NUMBER” so that people can find it and confirm you BE/DO with full responsibility and liability.

Question #17: Technically, we shouldn’t have to file in court, its a living soul to living soul interaction. No foreclosed courts needed.

Heather: All private Courts operating under the guise of public courts already foreclosed…they have to establish standing, authority, and law before they can even get to the point of “you are required to come” bit.

Question #18: “Notice to Principal is notice to agent. Notice to Agency is notice to principal.’ Send it to the CEO [principal] you can almost always find their name on the company website. I know Heather mentions educating from the bottom up, however, why not start at the top down and or top down and bottom up.

Heather: Top already done…education so to speak is from the bottom up NOW and if the “bottom up” see the people standing and BE’ing and DO’ing kindly but firmly with grace and love…it starts up that water cooler talk within the offices, but also within the eternal heart and the mind. (heart)

Question #19: How many CVACs are up & running now? last I heard it was just the one. hopefully there are more now.

Heather: 7+ Billion on this planet…more in Source’s Universe (going through similar thing or surprises that they did not expect (chuckle)) Many CVAC’s are DO’ing and BE’ing awesome…some are a bit shaky, but holding that desire and absolutely starting to get it…a few are holding that contrast so that the others can consciously make an informed choice that they BE and DO by their free will with responsibility and liability….OR NOT.

CVAC SYSTEM (REGISTERED as GOVERNMENT)…one is up and running the remaining 193 are being refined for formal activation this week…the one that is up and running is also being refined for formal renewal.

Question #20: Guy in OPPT UK is going to jail for tax evasion. He done the OPPT notice but he still going to jail. Watt should he do. They claim UCC don’t work because tax evasion is criminal to them!

Heather: did “they” produce the documentation of their standing, authority, law and the original wet-ink signature accommodation agreement that this guy signed (not).

Question #21: These notices don’t enforce anything. We still getting walked over!

Heather: OPPT took care of the old stuff…the CN’s are you BE’ing and DO’ing responsible and liable without confrontation, with grace. It appears they walk all over you and they hope that you will accept that as truth so that they don’t have to answer…what DO you consciously choose…if they DO not answer then they cannot enforce as a matter of law, matter of fact and as a matter of public policy…you cannot stop them from making their free will choice to BE corrupt or ignorant, which are THEIR terms and conditions of offer to contract with you…but you can keep them liable and responsible by giving them your terms and conditions of offer to contract with fee schedules for what it costs them to be corrupt, irresponsible and ignorant, inclusive of failing to produce their standing, authority, law and a an accommodation agreement (that says you agree/belong to a corporation) with your wet-ink signature…give them your terms and conditions and offer to contract with courtesy notice of what was done by OPPT, the one people of the planet…by their own former “legal rules” they loose as a matter of law, fact and public policy that they all brought under UCC.

Question #22: I’m very ready to get started on bondservant/public servant.

Heather: Bondservants were certified as satisfied and reconciled back to Absolute…co-creator (because that is Absolute Truth and also because we did not want PTW to fabricate a “creator” to put us back into “divine” or other slavery where we would have to play “undivine” or “slave”…see December 10, 2012 UCC filing No. 2012132883…otherwise BE of service to self and help others if you so choose by your free will with responsibility and liability…no bond or “sign up” required by CVAC’s to CVAC’s…

Question #23: [Can you share your views] n Energy and its Harvesting and how collective Energy “has been” used and how WE can infuse a “kNew Energy” for Intentive Transformation , I imagine this knowledge shared from Her perspective centered in Love will create a “kNew” wave and Views of DoIng and BeIng …. many Blessings!

Heather: it is already happening…all your BE’ing and DO’ing, inclusive of between December 25, 2012 to present…has draw huge amounts of energy for you to pull down and manifest as you choose…no collective is required…the Absolute Frequency of that energy is pure…which is why the PTW cannot access it or use it directly…they hoped they could at least manipulate through old tools of fear, warring, separation and harvesting (religion, Gregorian calendar, schools, corporations, Face book, Google, etc.) to get you to all DO in the manner that serves their sole interests…your tools of resonance and following what resonates within has pretty much squashed that hope of theirs (chuckle)

Question #24: Foreclosures reversed: Story: my friend had a BOA person come to her house cuz she’s behind/in foreclosure, and he told her that people are getting their homes back…they are going to court is what she said to me.

Heather: They know they can’t just take the homes at this point as they had been DO’ing…the best option they concluded they had was to get the people to come into the private courts and consent (albeit unknowingly, unwillingly, and unintentionally) to a revised contract, reaging of the accounts revised model (that is why purported collection agencies demand that people pay even just five dollars over the phone (no cash) so that they can leverage the value that was just given them) (chuckle) similar to the TARP and mortgage programs that failed…the beginning of the investigations focused on that sham and the purpose of that…the value from that “program” 700+ billion USD had already been paid out to large fraudulent securities holders CHINA and others so that they wouldn’t tell..

Question #25: Next step normally would be to set a court date, Everyone is familiar with the CN’s,, which say,, no phone contract,, so question I have is,, do I call Monday, or go to court house and inquire about a court day,, or call the Attorney, and ask him how his week end reading was ?

Heather: [G]o[ing] in to (foreclosed) private court is consent to their offer to contract and terms and conditions (most tacit aka hidden or presumed with out giving notice or transparency)…did they accept your offer to contract? if it is ongoing matter, did you cancel the securities they cut/issued from your case? They use your signatures as the underwriting for securities…begins when you open a case or when you answer their complaint. Examples of collapsing the underwriting of the securities, known and unknown: AT 4:58 AM THERE ARE 3 PDF FILES THAT HEATHER PROVIDED. I DON’T HAVE HEATHER AS A CONTACT SO I COULD NOT OPEN THE FILES. PERHAPS YOU CAN?

Question #26: Is it possible to send out a blanket courtesy notice to a electrical company who are robbing a lot of people by putting the bills up and up, I was talking to someone who thought his bill was too high at 60.00 and mine is 136.00 way, way too high…… and no I don’t use a lot of power or have a lot of stuff plugged in.

Heather: yes…you want to focus on the contract that was cut giving that corporation power and authority over nature…energy….the contract and agreements are very interesting and detailed…the brokers/agents of the PTW want to secure their piece of the pie…it is hilarious and reliable.

Question #27: Does anyone know if I actually owe $$ if I received products from the use a credit card?

Heather: credit cards work the same as promissory notes…each credit receipt is actually a promissory note that is then leveraged…but they can’t produce documentation either that a loan was actually made… (chuckle)

Question #28: Any thoughts on whether I can help someone with the CN? i.e.: get persons name and send on their behalf?

Heather: This is about responsibility and liability…as a former attorney…we are trained to do “on behalf of”..what they don’t tell you is that “on behalf of” establishes the incompetence of the one you are intent on helping…hence, purported judges instance on labelling and recording you as “pro se” and not “pro per”….pro se=appearing on behalf of one’s self (FICTION) vs. pro er = appearing as your self (BE’ing).

Question #29: I’m looking for a remedy of not having the funds to pay my back taxes,, the only remedy that is offered is to sell my home at tax sale, and that’s not very appealing,, , so this would make their actions illegal wouldn’t it?

Heather: AND who is asking for payment (purported taxes)? Did you require them to produce their standing, authority, law, and the accommodation agreement with your wet-ink signature? They have to show those before they can demand something.

Question #30: Question: Heather can you explain how the penal code (law) fits in with OPPT? Is there a hierarchy of law? Which law takes precedence over the other, which one is more important? Common Law or other Laws?

Heather: penal code..criminal code…all codes are private corporate rules operating under the guise of government, unless they can produce documentation of their standing, authority, law and your accommodation agreement with your wet-ink signature….”no one goes to jail without their consent” (from a retired judge).

Question #31: In a Federal Case brought against a friend and her Son for growing Marijuana for medicinal purposes in CA (where it is actually LEGAL TO DO) what would the best OPPT approach be. They are facing 15 years each. She had a Son who died of cancer when he was 9 and his oncologist was the one who taught her how to use it. The court will not allow medical data as a defence (even though it manufactures and exports it to other countries for medicinal use). She goes to Court on April 2nd I believe.

Heather: Is this about her and her story or is this about her saying to them “what is your standing, authority, law, and the original accommodation agreement with my wet-ink signature?” If they produced any of those documents then you would understand exactly how they got you to unknowingly, unwillingly, and intentionally consent to something you did not have the material facts to…and in the same instance they give you the evidence of their own “crimes” (chuckle)

Question #32: I wonder how will we travel from nation to nation with passports? Or with out Passports? Maybe another kind of Passport document?

Heather: ask for identification interview…they cannot lawfully and legally stop or deny any one the right to travel…unless you consent to them doing so.

Question #33: how can I use the CVAC to stop paying for the registration to the state on my car without having trouble with the so called police?

Heather: your car was still in the system prior to OPPT filings? there was a process to take it out of system (all car titles were held by agents of PTW…WB/IMF/BIS, etc.)…OPPT took care of all that in the filings…Courtesy Notices reference all of that and give them the terms and conditions to engage with you and your car (chuckle)…

Question #34: I have a mandatory invitation from the police for today – claiming something about purchase, possession and processing of some healing-herbs – that I NEVER “purchase” but FIND – NEVER claim to “possess” but merely >utilize and >share* – and the “processing” is more like an involuntary but definitely *desirable* occurrence.. I’ll just ignore that I guess.

Heather : Send them a courtesy notice with your terms and conditions to contract in order to engage with you…inclusive of condition to produce documentation of their standing, authority, law and original accommodation agreement with your wet-ink signature.

Question #35: Hemp is a great resource for lot of things. This is no joke. I heard hemp make very good writing paper.

Heather #36: Hemp plant…hhhmmm….restricting nature? what is their standing authority law and the accommodation agreement…have you seen the patent and the former UN treaties on marijuana/hemp? Oh my gosh it is as hilarious as CHINA making it illegal for any one to reincarnate without prior government approval (rofl)…ahhh but the Absolute Data on THAT is interesting!        …and no it is not a China/Tibet only issue…

Question #37: Is the National Security Act of 1947 going to shut down? I heard there was a lot of illegal operation, black operation to support the parallel government that runs behind National Security Act of 1947.

Heather: Cancelled last summer.

Question #38: If I understand the Doing correctly, in order to DO, it should be without reservation and with total and full BElief in what one is DOing; we have listened to many speak of this on the radio shows.

Heather: not belief…just conscious knowing, willing and intentional responsibility and liability for what one is DO’ing…knowing is more powerful, effective and attracts more energy behind it than belief….belief more than faith…all those are more when done consciously than unconsciously.

Question #39: You answered a previous question about Doing for someone else regarding the CN and I got that; my question is, when and how will this cease to be an issue for BEings that may not have the ability to do this on their own?

Heather: That is where I would say…Caleb, Randall, and I were knowingly, willingly, and consciously responsible and liable for what we chose to DO …BE responsible and liable for our respective BE’ing and DO’ing….but also consciously choosing to preserve that opportunity to BE and DO with responsibility and liability if they chose/choose to DO so. ASSISTING OTHERS TO ASSIST THEM SELF. I worked for over a year to make sure and refine my own process of assisting others to assist them self and NOT FOR BE TO DO ON THEIR BEHALF…wasn’t perfect at it for sure…maybe still not… (heart)

Question # 40: However, what if that person IS incompetent? We are paying my mother-in-law’s mortgage and debts. She has stage 3 Alzheimer’s and my husband has invoked the poa (power of attorney) for her. Can he send CNs on her behalf? Or should we have her sign the CNs, even though she would have no idea what she is signing (plus she is blind so signature, in addition to not being legible, would be nowhere near the line).

Heather: That is a different situation in where you consciously choose to be of service, with full responsibility liability….same as what the Trustees did with the foreclosure and preserving the opportunity…the people may not have asked for us to do that, but we had access to the mechanisms, operations, and data that the people did not (those that did have it were either participants/beneficiaries/agents of PTW, receiving an unlawful and illegal benefit…and then there were a few who tried to force their way into the club meanwhile charging those of the people they deemed worthy of taking with them or saying “I’ll get you this if you give me the authority to act for you, but I can’t disclose things to you or none of us get paid…same game PTW played with their agents….THE PEOPLE DESERVED BETTER in our knowing…they deserve what is theirs)…sooooo DO consciously with full responsibility and liability…you are her co-custodians…DO’ing by preserving her opportunity to DO if and when she can.

To submit OPPT related question to Heather. Please post them here

This Q & A was originally posted at Removing The Shackles